Browsing by Subject "Biomass production"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Climate‐based identification of suitable cropping areas for giant reed and reed canary grass on marginal land in Central and Southern Europe under climate change
(2023) Ferdini, Sofia; von Cossel, Moritz; Wulfmeyer, Volker; Warrach‐Sagi, Kirsten
Giant reed (GR) and reed canary grass (RCG) have emerged as promising perennial industrial crops for providing sustainable bioenergy from marginal land. However, there is great uncertainty among farmers and researchers about where these crops can be grown in the future due to climate change, which complicates a timely transition to a bioeconomy. Therefore, this study quantifies marginal land and suitable cropping areas for GR and RCG in Europe, as well as their overlap. To derive these areas, the present (1991–2020) and future (2071–2100, RCP8.5) growing degree days, growing season length, annual precipitation, and aridity index were analyzed using the E‐OBS observational dataset and EURO‐CORDEX regional climate simulations. The study concludes that while marginal land will decrease by ~18%, GR and RCG will profit from the changing European climate, increasing by ~24% and ~13%, respectively. Looking at regions of overlap between marginal land and the selected crops, a decrease of ~87% and an increase of ~462% is projected for RCG and GR, respectively. This is due to marginal land shifting southward, benefitting the warm‐season grass GR, while RCG prefers cooler climates.
Long-term trends in yield variance of temperate managed grassland
(2023) Macholdt, Janna; Hadasch, Steffen; Macdonald, Andrew; Perryman, Sarah; Piepho, Hans-Peter; Scott, Tony; Styczen, Merete Elisabeth; Storkey, Jonathan; Macholdt, Janna; Professorship of Agronomy, Institute of Agriculture and Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany; Hadasch, Steffen; Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Macdonald, Andrew; Protecting Crops and Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK; Perryman, Sarah; Computational and Analytical Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK; Piepho, Hans-Peter; Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Scott, Tony; Protecting Crops and Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK; Styczen, Merete Elisabeth; Section of Environmental Chemistry and Physics, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Storkey, Jonathan; Protecting Crops and Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK
The management of climate-resilient grassland systems is important for stable livestock fodder production. In the face of climate change, maintaining productivity while minimizing yield variance of grassland systems is increasingly challenging. To achieve climate-resilient and stable productivity of grasslands, a better understanding of the climatic drivers of long-term trends in yield variance and its dependence on agronomic inputs is required. Based on the Park Grass Experiment at Rothamsted (UK), we report for the first time the long-term trends in yield variance of grassland (1965–2018) in plots given different fertilizer and lime applications, with contrasting productivity and plant species diversity. We implemented a statistical model that allowed yield variance to be determined independently of yield level. Environmental abiotic covariates were included in a novel criss-cross regression approach to determine climatic drivers of yield variance and its dependence on agronomic management. Our findings highlight that sufficient liming and moderate fertilization can reduce yield variance while maintaining productivity and limiting loss of plant species diversity. Plots receiving the highest rate of nitrogen fertilizer or farmyard manure had the highest yield but were also more responsive to environmental variability and had less plant species diversity. We identified the days of water stress from March to October and temperature from July to August as the two main climatic drivers, explaining approximately one-third of the observed yield variance. These drivers helped explain consistent unimodal trends in yield variance—with a peak in approximately 1995, after which variance declined. Here, for the first time, we provide a novel statistical framework and a unique long-term dataset for understanding the trends in yield variance of managed grassland. The application of the criss-cross regression approach in other long-term agro-ecological trials could help identify climatic drivers of production risk and to derive agronomic strategies for improving the climate resilience of cropping systems.
Ökonomische Bewertung regionaler Wettbewerbspotentiale verschiedener landwirtschaftlicher Biomassen im Rahmen der Bioökonomie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Baden-Württembergs
(2020) Petig, Eckart; Bahrs, Enno
The finite nature of fossil resources and climate change pose major challenges to the global society and require a comprehensive transformation of the current economic system. One important aspect of this transformation, also known as bioeconomy, is the transition from a fossil-based to a bio-based supply of raw materials. In this context, agricultural production represents an important supplier of raw materials, which in Germany is already characterized by a strong competition for the scarce land. The scarce land is a major challenge of the expansion of the use of agricultural biomass for the bioeconomy. Accordingly, the derivation of the potential of agricultural biomass for bioeconomy requires consideration of the tradeoffs between various utilization paths. In this context, economic models can be valuable methods, which on one hand are able to depict the trade-offs of different value chains and can, on the other hand, incorporate the uncertainty by developing suitable scenarios. The aim of this thesis is the evaluation of the potential of different agricultural biomasses for the bioeconomy and to analyze the associated effects on agricultural production structures in Baden-Wuerttemberg. In chapter 2 the potential of grassland as a biogas substrate is evaluated, which might be important for the bioeconomy in the future. Due to the more complex harvesting process and partly unfavorable production conditions, grassland has higher production costs compared to arable biogas substrates. The consideration of iLUC Factors with high prices for GHG emissions could improve the competitiveness of grassland to such an extent that it is competitive with the production of biogas substrates on arable land. However, silage maize is often the more favorable biogas substrate in many respects, as chapter 3 shows by means of a site modeling for biogas plants in Baden-Wuerttemberg. In chapter 4 and 5 the potential of straw for energetic and material use is analyzed. These investigations are based on the combination of EFEM with the techno-economic location optimization model BIOLOCATE. The results clearly show the interaction between the economies of scale and the rising raw material supply costs. On the one hand, the average investment costs decrease with increasing plant size, but on the other hand the raw material costs increase, because the transport distances increase and an increasing demand for biomass results also in higher market prices. Additionally, the results show that straw can make a fundamental contribution to the bioeconomy by providing regional bioenergy and as feedstock for material value chains. However, even the use of by-products can have effects on cultivation structures and thus, reduce the production of agricultural biogas substrates, among other things. In Chapter 6 the effects of macroeconomic expansion paths of the bioeconomy on agricultural production structures in Baden-Wuerttemberg are investigated. For this purpose, the results of an iterative model coupling between the agricultural sector model ESIM and the energy sector model TIMES-PanEU of four bioeconomic scenarios are scaled down from national level to regional and farm level using EFEM. The results show different impacts on farm types and thus illustrate the advantages of a differentiated analysis of the expansion of the bioeconomy. Therefore, farms with mainly extensive production methods such as suckler cow husbandry do not profit from the expansion of the bioeconomy due to unfavorable production conditions, while especially large arable farms in fertile regions would benefit disproportional more than the average. Basically, the results reveal limits to the mobilization of additional biomass potential. The reason for this is the already high cultivation intensity of agricultural production in Germany, in which the expansion of one production restricts production of another due to competition for the limited agricultural land. For grassland, the results show that the decline in grassland-based cattle farming and unfavorable economic conditions can lead to a significant increase of unused grassland. Grassland thus presents itself as a promising resource for biomass production for the bioeconomy, as it can provide important ecosystem services (e.g. biodiversity) in addition to the provision of raw materials. However, a political framework has to be established that promotes ecological services accordingly. Finally, in chapter 7 additional research needs are identified, which include further development of the methodological approach. These comprise an extension of the analysis by macroeconomic models to integrate interactions with the material use in a more detailed way. Furthermore, an integration of ecological parameters is necessary for a holistic analysis in the context of bioeconomy.