Browsing by Subject "Biene"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Effects of chronic pesticide and pathogen exposure on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) health at the colony level
(2018) Odemer, Richard; Bessei, Werner
During the last decade the increasing number of honey bee colony losses has become a major concern of beekeepers and scientists worldwide. Extensive research and cooperation projects have been established to unravel this phenomenon. Among parasites, pathogens and environmental factors, the use of agrochemicals, most notably the class of neonicotinoid insecticides, are suspected to be a key factor for this collapse. Current approaches not only focus on colony collapse but also on the weakening of honey bees by the exposure to sublethal concentrations of such pesticides. Recently, the EFSA temporarily banned three neonicotinoids including clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, for the use in crops attractive to pollinators. Thiacloprid however, likewise a neonicotinoid insecticide, is still tolerated for agricultural use because it is considered less toxic to bees. Nevertheless, some publications indicate sublethal effects of this agent leading to impairments of the colony. A general problem for the study of such sublethal effects is that they often are measurable in individual bees without eliciting clear impact at the colony level. In addition, such effects might only have a consequence in combination with other stressors like pathogens. This thesis presents two new methodical approaches combining the controlled application of stressors to individual bees with an evaluation of the effects under field realistic conditions of free flying colonies. In all approaches, the bees were treated with a combination of different pesticides and/or a combination of pesticides and a pathogen in order to evaluate synergistic interactions. As pathogen, Nosema ceranae, a novel intracellular gut parasite introduced from Asia, was used. This parasite is considered to contribute to “CCD”-like symptoms (“colony collapse disorder”), particularly in Spain. In Retschnig et al. (2015), observation hives at two study sites (Hohenheim and Bern) were used to clarify possible synergistic effects when honey bees are exposed to pesticides of two different substance classes (thiacloprid and tau-fluvalinate), both in combination with an infection of N. ceranae. Mortality, flight activity and social behaviour of individually marked and treated worker bees were monitored. At the Hohenheim site, no impact from any of the treatments could be confirmed except a slightly higher flight activity of the Nosema treated bees. At the Bern site however, the pesticide treatments elicited a significant reduction of worker bee lifespan, whereas the Nosema infection resulted in higher ratios of motionless periods. Importantly and in contrast to several laboratory studies, in neither of the two sites an interaction among the pesticides and the pathogen could be confirmed. The inconsistency of our results suggests that the effects of both, sublethal application of pesticides and infection with N. ceranae were rather weak and that interaction among them may have been overemphasized. To extend this first approach in small observation colonies, Odemer & Rosenkranz (2018) focused on performance parameters such as colony development and overwintering in honey bee colonies, using the same pesticides as in the observation hives. Here, neither the single exposure to thiacloprid or tau-fluvalinate nor their combination had negative effects on the colony performance. However, the chronic application of the tau-fluvalinate significantly reduced the infestation with Varroa mites. In Odemer et al. (2018), a neonicotinoid (clothianidin) with an extraordinary high toxicity to bees was applied alone and in combination with N. ceranae and N. apis. A novel approach was developed with individually marked bees that were infected after hatching with a certain number of Nosema spores and introduced into mini-hives. In order to simulate worst case field conditions, the pesticide was then applied chronically in sublethal concentrations over the whole lifespan of the bees. Again in contrast to previous laboratory studies, no effect of the clothianidin treatment on mortality or flight activity could be observed. However, the lifespan of Nosema infected bees was significantly reduced compared to non-infected bees, but in agreement with the observation hive experiment, the combination of pesticide and pathogen did not reveal any synergistic effect. The results of the three experiments of this thesis indicate that (i) individual honey bees are less impaired by neonicotinoids if kept within the social environment of the colony and that (ii) sublethal concentrations of neonicotinoids in the field are not the main driver for colony losses. These statements refer exclusively to the honey bee colony as a eusocial superorganism that obviously is more resilient to pesticide exposure through mechanisms of “social buffering”.
Der Einfluss von Wirtsfaktoren der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.) auf den Reproduktionserfolg der parasitischen Milbe Varroa destructor (Anderson & Trueman) auf die Auswirkungen einer horizontalen Verbreitung des Parasiten auf den Befall der Bienenvölker
(2014) Frey, Eva; Bessei, Werner
The honey bee colony is faced with a huge number of pathogens, including bee viruses, bacteria, fungi and mites. Among these pathogens, the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is considered the most important parasite of the honey bee worldwide. This mite was discovered at the beginning of the last century in South East Asia within colonies of the original host, the Eastern honey bee Apis cerana. From the middle of the last century the mite has been spread worldwide by transports of infested A. mellifera colonies with dramatic consequences for both, feral and managed honey bee colonies. In the meantime this parasite has become the most serious economic problem for global beekeeping. In temperate climates nearly all honey bee colonies are infested and without yearly Varroa treatments these colonies would collapse within a few years. This confirms that a stable host parasite relationship has not been established yet. Therefore the control of V. destructor still represents the main challenge for beekeeping. The main reason for host damages is the dramatic increase of the Varroa population during the season. Our honey bee colonies are obviously unable to control this population dynamic of the parasite. The increase of the mite population is influenced by the reproductive rate of Varroa females within individual brood cells, by host-parasite-interactions on the colony level and by interactions among honey bee colonies on the population level. The dissertation at hand presents experimental approaches and results at all three levels. On the individual level we were able to demonstrate that age-dependent signals of the honey bee larvae not only activate the oogenesis of the Varroa females but even trigger the further course of mite reproduction. Our studies on the activation of the Varroa reproduction revealed that exclusively larvae within 18 h (worker) and 36 h (drones), respectively, after cell capping were able to stimulate the mite’s oogenesis. Furthermore, we were able to confirm for the first time the presence of a signal in the host larvae allowing the reproducing mites to adjust their own reproductive cycle to the ontogenetic development of the host. Under certain conditions such host signals can even stop an oogenesis of the female mite that has already been started. From an adaptive point of view that sort of a stop signal enables the female mite to save resources for a next reproductive cycle if the own egg development is not sufficiently synchronized with the development of the host. My results indicate that age specific volatiles of the larval cuticle are involved in the regulation of mite reproduction. According to preliminary quantitative GC–MS analysis we suggest certain fatty acid ethyl esters as candidate compounds. These host signals – either involved in the activation or in the interruption of the Varroa reproduction – offer possibilities to influence the reproductive success of Varroa females and might therefore be used for biological control in the future. Within an EU cooperation project we could additionally demonstrate that the so called temporary infertility of Varroa females is significantly correlated with three QTL of the host larvae. This confirms a genetic basis for host resistance factors that inhibit the mite reproduction. For this study we made use of the fact that we had access to a honey bee population at the island of Gotland, Sweden that has survived mite infestation without any treatment for more than 10 years. We crossed a queen from this tolerant population with drones from susceptible colonies to rear hybrid queens and produced a mapping population of haploid drones from these hybrids. Because honey bees have a haplodiploid sex determination, the haploid drones provide an extremely simple and highly efficient model system for genetic studies. Subsequently, we mapped three candidate target regions on chromosomes 4, 7, and 9. Although the individual effect of these three QTL was found to be relatively small, the set of all three had significant impact on the suppression of V. destructor reproduction by epistasis. The detection of this epistatic interaction was only possible because we used the simple genetic make-up of haploid drones. For studies on Varroa resistance on the colony level and for selection programs the interactions among the colonies of the local honey bee population have to be considered. In two experimental approaches I was able to prove that the invasion of Varroa mites from neighboring colonies – often called “reinvasion” – significantly influences the population dynamic of the parasite within the colony. First, we quantified the number of mites invading individual colonies in relation to the invasion pressure (= number and distance of infested colonies). For this approach we made use of an isolated military training area near Münsingen at the Swabian Alb not accessible to other beekeepers. We established ten “mite receiver colonies” continuously treated against V. destructor and placed them at distances of 1m to 1.5 km from four heavily infested “mite donor colonies”. In the donor colonies, we estimated the population of bees, brood, and V. destructor at three week intervals. The invasion of mites into the receiver colonies was recorded every 7-12 days. During the measurement period of about two months, between 85 and 444 mites per colony were introduced into the receiver colonies. Surprisingly, there were no significant differences in the invasion rates in relation to the distance between donor and receiver colonies. The second approach was performed under more realistic field conditions of two experimental apiaries established in regions with high and low bee densities, respectively. Additionally, in this experiment we analyzed the multiplication of the invaded mites. Thereby we confirmed that horizontal transmission plus the reproduction of the invaded Varroa mites can cause an exponential increase of the mite population that may exceed the damage threshold within three months. We were further able to show that the invasion rates – and therefore the final infestation – differ significantly according to the number of honey bee colonies in the neighborhood of the apiary: At the site with a high bee density, the average invasion rate per colony over the entire three and a half months period was 462 mites per colony compared to only 126 mites per colony at the site with a low bee density. As a consequence, the colonies of the apiary at the high bee density site revealed an average final infestation in November of 2,082 mites per colony compared to 340 mites per colony at the low bee density site. The highly infested colonies lost about three times more bees compared to the lower infested colonies – obviously a result of Virus infections transmitted by Varroa mites. With my different approaches I was able to add further elements of knowledge for a better understanding of how host factors and ambient conditions influence the Varroa reproduction within individual brood cells and the population dynamic within a honey bee colony. A better knowledge of these host parasite interactions is essential for the selection of mite resistant colonies and further more important for the development of concepts for an effective Varroa treatment.
Freisetzung von Neonicotinoiden aus der Saatgutbeizung in Guttation von Kulturpflanzen und deren Auswirkungen auf Honigbienen Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
(2015) Reetz, Jana E.; Zebitz, Claus P. W.
Seed coating with the systemic neonicotinoids clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam was considered environmental justifiable and no side effects on non-target organisms such as honey bees were considered during the registration process as seed coatings. In 2008, sowings with neonicotinoid-coated corn has caused severe damages on honey bee colonies in the upper Rhine Valley, Germany. As a consequence, the seed coating with neonicotinoids in maize and wheat was suspended in Germany in May 2008; since May 2013 there is a temporary ban of the three neonicotinoids by the EU Regulation No. 485/2013. The release of systemic active substances (a.s.) in guttation of seed-coated plants, e.g. winter oilseed rape (WOR, Brassica napus L.), represents a possible contamination source for non-target organisms and could actively be used as a water source by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). The occurrence of guttation was examined and sampled under field conditions in maize, xtriticale and WOR. The residual analysis of guttation from seed-coated WOR revealed the release of residues up to 130 µg a.s. L-1 in autumn (Reetz et al. 2015). However, even the highest residues in WOR guttation are considerably lower than those in guttation of maize (up to 8,000 µg a.s. L-1) or xtriticale (up to 1,300 µg a.s. L-1; Reetz et al. 2011). In spring, the released residues in WOR guttation are lower than in early autumn (~30 µg a.s. L-1) and continue to decline steadily until flowering. Considerable high amounts of residues have been released by maize (spring crop) over a long period of the crop cycle. Laboratory investigations (according to OECD-Guideline 213) showed that feeding of isolated honey bees with a sugar/guttation-solution from seed-coated WOR leads to a mortality less than 20 % (Wallner et al. 2012), but this way of exposure is not similar to the situation of water foraging honey bees. Observations of water foraging honey bees in the field are nearly impossible. Therefore, honey-sac content of foragers returning to the hive were analysed for residues (Reetz and Wallner 2014). These experiments showed that on the one side the weight of honey sacs is lower during autumn at the same time when high residues in guttation of seed-coated WOR occur than in summer, and on the other side, that the intake of water is increased by the factor of 25 compared to the amount of nectar, which seems to be associated with the absence of nectar sources during autumn (Reetz et al. 2012). There seems to be no exclusive season- or daytime-depending water collecting activity in honey bee colonies in temperate zones. Therefore, the collection of guttation from seed-coated plants by foraging honey bees is likely. However, during summer and the periods of high nectar flows honey bees might gather rather runny nectar as a replacement for water than WOR guttation. Honey bees gathering on WOR guttation were just occasionally observed in a small-patterned landscape, but more frequently in the field site with intensive agriculture and a reduced variety of alternative water sources. HPLC-MS-analysis of honey sacs (n= 204) reveal that residues of thiamethoxam are detectable in 19 % (n= 38) of the honey-sac contents with a range of 0.3 to 0.95 µg a.s. per litre (LOQ= 0.3 µg a.s. L-1; Reetz et al. 2015 accepted). In 12 % (n= 24) of the samples, thiamethoxam could be detected in concentrations below LOQ. Clothianidin and its metabolite TZMU were measured in one sample each (0.5 %) at concentrations below LOQ (clothianidin) and LOD (TZMU), respectively. Based on these experiments, it has been proven that honey bees use guttation of seed-coated WOR as water source in absence of alternative nearby water sources. Thus, during a short period of about a few weeks in autumn, when the highest residues are released in WOR guttation, there might theoretically be a risk for single honey bees. Guttation of xtriticale and WOR is just temporary present in the field, whereas guttation of maize is present in the leaf sheaths during the day due to the funnel function of the maize leaves. Additionally to theses facts, there is a low water demand in honey bee colonies during autumn in contrast to the occurrence of maize guttation, which occurs at the same time when honey bee colonies raise and have an increasing demand of water. The current evaluation of short-term effects of chronic exposure to sublethal concentrations of neonicotinoids in pollen on honey bees at colony level is based on the application of higher concentrations (2 ppb clothianidin; Sandrock et al. 2014) than detected in the honey-sac contents of the water foraging honey bees in this experiment (< 1 µg a.s. L-1; < 1 ppb). Based on these threshold values for side effects by chronic feeding of neonicotinoids, the concentrations of residues measured in the honey sacs of water foraging honey bees seem to have still less potential for side effects on single honey bees or on colony level.
The production of melezitose in honeydew and its impact on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
(2021) Seeburger, Victoria; Hasselmann, Martin
Honeydew honey is a honey type which is of high economic importance in Europe. Phloem sap feeding insects of the order Hemiptera (true bugs) excrete honeydew, the key component of honeydew honey. Beekeepers move their hives between forest regions so that their bees can process the honeydew into honey. In case of high osmolality in the phloem sap of the hemipterans’ host trees, they counteract osmotic pressure by osmoregulation and produce oligosaccharides such as melezitose. Melezitose-rich honeydew honey is a major issue for beekeepers; it crystallises and obstructs the combs, leading to an economical loss. Nevertheless, precise analyses of the conditions of the occurrence of melezitose have not been realised. Furthermore, it is not known which impacts the trisaccharide has on honey bee health and the honeydew flow disease documented in beekeepers’ journals can have one explanation in the nutrition on melezitose. In order to determine influence factors for the emergence of melezitose, more than 600 honeydew droplets from defined honeydew producer species were collected under different environmental conditions (hemipteran species (host tree specific), natural area, air temperature, relative humidity, altitude, time of the year and of the day) between 2016 and 2019. The sugar spectra were analysed by high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. To obtain the impact of melezitose on honey bee health, additional feeding experiments with daily evaluation of food uptake, gut-body weight ratio and mortality have been realised between 2017 and 2019. Additionally, comprehensive 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing of the gut microbial community has been performed. Remarkable differences could be found in the amount of melezitose between honeydew samples collected from different honeydew producer species and according to different environmental conditions. Air temperature increases and decreases in relative humidity increased the melezitose production in honeydew by the observed seven hemipteran species. Both, scale insect species on Picea abies and aphid species on Abies alba produced significantly less honeydew containing melezitose than aphid species on Picea abies. Additionally, honeydew with increased melezitose content was significantly more frequent collected in natural areas with limited water reservoir capacities, at higher altitudes and years with low precipitation. All results lead to the conclusion that hemipteran species produce more melezitose when the host trees have less access to water, increasing the osmolality of the phloem sap and indirectly enhancing the osmoregulation with producing melezitose by hemipteran species. Bees fed with melezitose showed increased food uptake and higher gut-body weight ratio than the control groups. Furthermore, melezitose feeding caused disease symptoms such as swollen abdomen, abdomen tipping and impaired movement and a significantly higher mortality than in control groups. Gut microbiota analyses indicated a shift of the bacterial species Lactobacillus Firm-4 and Lactobacillus kunkeei in favour of Lactobacillus Firm-5 in melezitose fed bees. This PhD project provides the important knowledge about the indicators that point out an enhanced melezitose production. This is a valuable contribution to design a warning system for beekeepers that will help to prevent harmful nutrition for honey bees or crystallised honey in the future by timely removal of bee colonies from local regions at risk. Additionally, feeding experiments point out the high effort that is required for the degradation process of the large-molecule melezitose. This effort might lead to a higher uptake of food, heavier guts, shorter lifespan and a higher susceptibility to intestinal diseases. Finally, an evidence was presented that the lactic acid bacteria of the gut microbiota are significantly involved in the digestion of melezitose.
Theoretical analysis and preference modelling for the valuation of ecosystem services from native pollinators in selected Thai rural communities
(2018) Narjes, Manuel; Lippert, Christian
Until now, the existing microeconomic models concerned with pollination markets have not accommodated the global diversity of beekeeper-farmer interactions. The most prominent of such theoretical models is dedicated to describing the determinants of colony stocking densities and of equilibrium wages that farmers have paid to commercial beekeepers for decades in the highly bee-pollination reliant almond monocultures of California. This cumulative dissertation generalizes this basic model by taking into account the marginal productivity of a given agro-ecosystem’s wild bees and the opportunity costs that farmers incur when assigning labor time to beekeeping. In that regard, we assessed the economic potential of on-farm beekeeping, which can involve several bee species, by juxtaposing this activity’s net benefits against those from hiring commercial pollination services. In addition to serving as a classification tool for a plurality of farmer-beekeeper-nature interactions and related optimization problems, the resulting analytical framework helps identifying the institutional settings that are most likely to lead to a specific bioeconomic equilibrium supply of pollination. What is more, it illustrates the interplay of the pertinent economic and agro-ecological factors, thus assisting the postulation of empirically testable hypotheses. We also conducted two separate discrete choice experiments (DCEs) with orchardists from the Thai provinces of Chiang Mai (N = 198 respondents) and Chanthaburi (N = 127), in order to elicit their preferences for changes in the population of local wild bees that would hypothetically result from a conservation policy consisting (along with a per-household implementation fee) of at least one of the following three measures: (i) offering farmers bee-friendly alternatives to conventional agro-chemicals, (ii) enabling the protection and/or rehabilitation of natural bee habitats near cropland, and (iii) fostering the husbandry of native bee species by transferring technical knowledge on the practice of on-farm beekeeping. In this context, we fitted random parameter logit models on the Chiang Mai dataset. They yielded a significant willingness to pay (WTP) for the presented conservation measures and suggested that the disutility the respondents perceived for a 50% decline in the local population of native bees was greater than the utility they would derive from experiencing a bee population increase of the same magnitude. Moreover, comparing our aggregated WTP estimates to the expected production losses, showed that orchard farmers underestimated the true use value of pollination. On the other hand, the average WTP for all conservation measures combined by far exceeded the costs that, according to our calculations, each household would incur for such a project to be implemented. Our models also indicated a significant preference heterogeneity in the sampled population, which we could partly explain with idiosyncratic variables such as the respondents’ attitudes towards native bees and beekeeping. Finally, we examined further sources of randomness in the observed choice behavior, by modelling the unknown choice decision-relevant influences that could not be captured during the DCEs. To that end, we fitted generalized mixed logit (GMXL) models on the pooled datasets, which allowed comparing, on a common utility scale, the part-worth (value) estimates from Chiang Mai and Chanthaburi, where different experimental designs were applied. Our results reveal that farmers in Chanthaburi, who reported having experienced crop declines that they attributed to insufficient pollination, introduced less subjective factors into their choices than their Chiang Mai counterparts, who may have been less familiar with the importance of conserving bees. Moreover, the GMXL results also suggest that Chanthaburi farmers placed a significantly higher value on the above-mentioned measures (i) and (ii), while caring comparatively less about a 50% decline in local wild bee colonies. One can thus hypothesize that an actual local pollinator decline may have made Chanthaburi farmers more aware of the importance of conserving native bees, while paradoxically making them more independent from the provision of wild pollination services, as they started managing crop pollination with stingless bees.