A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Abstract (English)

This study investigated the drought protection effects of six fungal and bacterial inoculants and ten consortia thereof on vegetative growth, nutritional status, and tuberization of potato under controlled and field conditions. It was hypothesized that microbial consortia offer improved drought protection as compared with single strains, due to complementary or synergistic effects, with differential impacts also of N fertilization management. Under NO3− fertilization, a 70% reduction in water supply over six weeks reduced shoot and tuber biomass of non-inoculated plants by 30% and 50%, respectively, and induced phosphate (P) limitation compared to the well-watered control. The P nutritional status was significantly increased above the deficiency threshold by three single-strain inoculants and eight consortia. This was associated with the presence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculant Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL41833 (five cases) and stimulation of root growth (five cases). Additionally, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 and AMF + Pseudomonas brassicacearum 3Re2-7 significantly reduced irreversible drought-induced leaf damage after recovery to well-watered conditions. However, the microbial inoculants did not mitigate drought-induced reductions in tuber biomass, neither in greenhouse nor in field experiments. By contrast, NH4+-dominated fertilization significantly increased tuber biomass under drought stress (534%), which was further increased by additional AMF inoculation (951%). This coincided with (i) improved enzymatic detoxification of drought-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS), (ii) improved osmotic adjustment in the shoot tissue (glycine betaine accumulation), (iii) increased shoot concentrations of ABA, jasmonic acid, and indole acetic acid, involved in drought stress signaling and tuberization, and (iv) reduced irreversible drought-induced leaf damage. Additional application of bacterial inoculants further improved ROS detoxification by increasing the production of antioxidants but stimulated biomass allocation towards shoot growth at the expense of tuber development. The results demonstrated that microbial consortia could increase the probability of drought protection effects influenced by the form of N supply. However, protective effects on vegetative growth do not necessarily translate into yield benefits, which can be achieved by adequate combination of inoculants and fertilizers.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a correction to:

A correction to this entry is available:

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Published in

Horticulturae, 10 (2024), 1, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010102. ISSN: 2311-7524
Faculty
Institute

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
630 Agriculture

Original object

Standardized keywords (GND)

BibTeX

@article{Mamun2024, doi = {10.3390/horticulturae10010102}, author = {Mamun, Abdullah Al and Neumann, Günter and Moradtalab, Narges et al.}, title = {Microbial consortia versus single-strain inoculants as drought stress protectants in potato affected by the form of N supply}, journal = {Horticulturae}, year = {2024}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, }