Browsing by Subject "Propagation method"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    A cropping system for yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. Endl.) : optimizing tuber formation, yield and sugar composition under European conditions
    (2020) Kamp, Larissa; Graeff-Hönninger, Simone
    The demand of healthy food is constantly increasing in Germany, as well as in developed countries in general. Here "healthy" is not clearly defined but it is often associated with foods indicating a low caloric value and further health-promoting benefits such as a high proportions of dietary fiber, phenols or antioxidants. In contrast, the proportion of obese people and the number of chronic diseases such as diabetes type II and obesity are increasing. As a result, the European Commission recommended to reduce the sugar content and the caloric value of food products, especially in sweetened beverages, breakfast cereals and dairy products by 10%. In general, a distinction can be made between artificial and natural sweeteners. Natural sweeteners such as honey, agave nectar or rapadura occur naturally and do not have to be artificially produced or synthesized. Disadvantages here are the high production costs as well as the high calorie value which is similar to conventionally used sugar. Artificial sweeteners, on the other hand, which are also known as "high-intensity sweeteners", have been artificially produced or synthesized. Examples are aspartame, saccharin or sucralose. They often have a lower calorie value (except for sugar alcohols such as xylitol or sorbitol) and are more economical to produce, which makes them particularly attractive for food producers. However, artificial sweeteners are suspected of being harmful to health or even carcinogenic. As a result, the consumer acceptance of artificial sweeteners is decreasing and the demand for natural sweeteners as alternatives is increasing. A possible alternative as a natural sweetener is yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius). Yacon is a tuberous root crop native to the Andean region. The roots store carbohydrates mainly as fructooligosaccharides (FOS). These FOS cannot be digested by the human intestinal tract, and therefore do not cause a noticeable increase of blood glucose level. In addition, high amounts of fiber, phenols and antioxidants lead to further health promoting benefits. So far, yacon has been cultivated mainly in the Andean region in smallholder structures. Therefore, there are several open questions regarding the cultivation of yacon in Europe, especially in the area of propagation, choice of genotypes and adapted nitrogen fertilization. Especially the propagation is an important factor, as it is normally done by seedlings of mother plants or single rhizome pieces, both with pre-cultivation in the greenhouse. This is expensive and leads to a price of 3.60 € for young plants. In addition, the influence of genotype and amount of nitrogen fertilization on tuber yield and sugar composition has not been investigated yet. These open questions regarding the cultivation of yacon in Europe outline the following objectives: • to evaluate differences between direct planting and pre cultivation of rhizomes in two ways with regard to yacon growth, development, tuber yield formation and cost distribution; • to investigate the yield potential of different yacon genotypes with regard to tuber yield, sugar yield and tuber composition under the given climatic conditions of Europe; • to determine the influence of different nitrogen levels on nitrogen uptake, tuber yield formation and amount of monosaccharides and polysaccharides as well as total sugar; • to investigate the environmental impact and the production costs of different yacon cultivation systems to determine the most sustainable cultivation method. To achieve the objectives, field trials were carried out a from 2016 to 2018. As a result, four scientific publications were developed, which formed the body of this thesis. Publication I focused on the differences between a propagation with pre-cultivation in the greenhouse (DSAB), rhizome pieces with pre-cultivation in the greenhouse (RP1) and a direct planting of rhizome pieces (RP2) in agronomic and economic terms. RP1 achieved the highest yield with 29.8 t ha 1 FM and differed significantly from the other treatments with 21.3 and 17.8 t ha-1 FM (DSAB and RP2, respectively). With regard to the cost per kg of produced yacon, RP1 was also convincing, which can be explained by a high tuber yield and comparatively low propagation costs. DSAB was the most expensive treatment and is therefore not recommended. Contrary to that RP2 has a high potential for mechanization and yield increases. Publication II investigated the differences between nine different genotypes with respect to tuber yield and sugar composition. The three genotypes red-shelled, brown-shelled and Morado achieved the significantly highest tuber yields with 46.6, 43.5 and 41.6 t FM ha-1. Also the sugar contents were outstanding with up to 66% of the DM in the red-shelled genotype. As a result, the sugar yields of these three genotypes were highest with 2.2, 2.0 and 1.9 t ha-1 in the same order as the tuber yields. In Publication III the influence of different amounts of nitrogen fertilizer (0, 40 and 80 kg ha-1) on tuber yield, sugar composition and nitrogen uptake of the brown- and red-shelled genotype was investigated. Both genotypes reached highest tuber yields of 50 and 67 t FM ha-1 at the highest nitrogen fertilizer amount (brown- and red-shelled, respectively). Contrary to this responded the total amounts of sugar and FOS. Both decreased with increasing amounts of nitrogen. With decreasing amounts of FOS, the proportion of FOS with higher degree of polymerization (DP) increased. With regard to the nitrogen utilization efficiency of both, tubers and the entire plant, a nitrogen amount of 40 kg N ha-1 seems to be sufficient and recommendable. Publication IV examined the ecological and economic sustainability of the cultivation of two genotypes (brown- and red-shelled), each with pre-cultivation in the greenhouse and as direct planting, with three different nitrogen fertilizer levels. The aim was to investigate the environmental impact and production costs of different yacon cultivation systems. Considering the costs, the highest fertilizer amount (80 kg N ha-1) led to the lowest production costs and also to comparatively low environmental impacts per functional unit (1 kg FOS). The red-shelled genotype performed better, both in terms of cost and environmental impact. This was mainly due to higher tuber yields. Overall, the preceding publications showed that the cultivation of yacon in Europe is possible and offers new possibilities for farmers. Embedding yacon successfully into existing cropping systems and crop rotations seems to be possible. The farmer has the opportunity to establish a promising new crop with great value potential on his farm in order to cover the increasing demand for raw materials for natural sweeteners.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Approaches to improve the implementation and expansion of Miscanthus production
    (2016) Xue, Shuai; Lewandowski, Iris
    Several species within the miscanthus genus (Miscanthus spp.) are characterized by high biomass yields and low production input requirements. This raised increasing interests in their applications for bioenergy. However, to date, only small areas of Miscanthus × giganteus (approximately 40,000 ha) are commercially grown and used for generating electricity and heat in Europe, where miscanthus has been developed as bioenergy crop for more than decade. Reviewing state-of-the-art revealed four main factors limiting the implementation of miscanthus production. These are inefficient and expensive propagation techniques, land use dilemma (i.e. lack of land available for growing miscanthus), lack of varieties/genotypes adapted to various and especially to stressful environmental conditions and lack of efficient agronomic practices for miscanthus establishment. Against these limiting factors, this thesis aims to (1) evaluate the different propagation systems with regard to technologies and costs, and improve the preferred rhizome propagation techniques; (2) address the land use dilemma through exploring marginal land (i.e. non-arable land with ability to grow plants with tolerance to environmental stresses) for miscathus production; (3) and screen optimal genotypes and effective practices for establishing and managing miscanthus on marginal land in a case study on grassland. To achieve the first objective, a review, our own field trials and farmer surveys were performed. Direct seed sowing was found to be the cheapest propagation method (1,508.5 € ha-1 overall establishment costs) and micro-propagation the most expensive (6,320.8 € ha-1). Direct rhizome planting is the farmers’ most preferred and most applied establishment method and has moderate establishment cost of 1,904-3,375.7 € ha-1. However, it goes along with the lowest propagation efficiency (1:10) and consequently restricts the availability of propagation material for large-scale plantations. However, the multiplication ratio can be increased by reducing the rhizome size. Field trial results showed that 6-cm length is close to the minimum size of rhizome that can germinate after directly planting into field. Compared to the traditionally used macro-rhizome, the multiplication ratio of the improved rhizome propagation (using 6-cm rhizomes) is tripled. In addition, the multiplication ratio can also be increased by transplanting rhizome- or stem-derived plantlets. However, due to higher labour and energy inputs required for the pre-growing of plantlets, their establishment cost reduction potential is limited, with estimated costs of 4,240.8-4,400.8 € ha-1. Direct seed sowing as the cheapest method is presently only possible for Miscanthus sinensis and not yet practical under German conditions. In addition, the seed-setting rate of M. sinensis is very low (0.0-28.7%) under the climatic conditions of south-west Germany, making commercial seeds production difficult. For all the propagation methods considered, more research efforts are still required to reduce the material production costs and simultaneously increase the multiplication ratio. For the second objective, the production potential of miscanthus on marginal land in China was assessed. Because China has limited agricultural land resources and its non-food bioenergy policy (it is only allowed to grow energy crops on marginal land) is adamant, there is a desideration for exploiting its marginal land potential. In this study, Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, model simulation were adopted to identify the productive marginal areas for miscanthus and to estimate their biomass and bioenergy production potentials. The results show that in China there are large marginal land areas of 17,163.54 × 104 ha available for growing miscanthus. However, due to limitation by low winter temperatures and low precipitation levels in some areas, the total marginal area suitable for growing miscanthus is only 769.37 × 104 ha. The Monteith radiation yield model was used to determine the potential miscanthus yield in Chinese climatic conditions. The simulation gave the actual harvestable yield levels on arable land of 18.1-44.2 odt ha-1 yr-1. Taking the environmental stresses of marginal conditions into account an achievable miscanthus yield potential on marginal land of 2.1-32.4 odt ha-1 yr-1 was calculated (varying between different marginal land types). Based on these achievable yield levels, the total miscanthus production potential on the entire suitable marginal land areas is 13,521.7 × 104 odt yr-1; the corresponding bio-electricity generation and total greenhouse gas saving potentials are 183.9 TW h yr-1 and 21,242.4 × 104 t CO2 eq. yr-1, respectively. The spatial distribution of the suitable marginal areas shows that they are mainly concentrated in the central part of Northeast China and the Loess Plateau. Both regions are recommended as priority development zones for the Chinese miscanthus-based bioenergy industry. However, implementation of this huge marginal land potential is currently constrained by many barriers, e.g. concerns on potential ecological effects, competition for marginal land from other uses, lack of high yield varieties in marginal conditions. Lack of varieties with suitability to marginal conditions and efficient agronomic practices for the establishment on marginal land are the main barriers that limit using marginal land for miscanthus production. Therefore, stress tolerant varieties need to be selected and methods of effective establishment of miscanthus on marginal land need to be developed. Worldwide, grassland is the most important marginal land type because it has the largest terrestrial area and mild environmental stresses for growing energy crops (including miscanthus). However, it is undesirable or even legally prohibited to convert grassland into bioenergy cropland to avoid biodiversity loss and soil carbon being reduced by tilling practices. Hence, no-till establishment practices for miscanthus establishment and maintenance on grassland are investigated here under the third objectives. Our study demonstrates that miscanthus can be successfully cultivated on both good (nutrient-rich) and marginal (nutrient-poor) grassland using the proposed agronomic practices and an increased grassland productivity may be achieved through the establishment of suitable miscanthus genotypes. The recommended agronomic practices are summarized as following. Miscanthus genotypes with tall, thick shoots perform better than those with short, thin shoots. Better establishment is achieved when rhizome-derived plantlets are transplanted into pre-disturbed grassland. The grassland pre-disturbance of low vegetation cutting (5 cm) and herbicide spraying in narrow stripes is recommended for its beneficial effect on miscanthus establishment without significant negative effects on grassland productivity. Two harvests, one in late spring and one in late autumn, are optimal to achieve a high grassland yield. In this thesis, the limitation of the inefficient propagation technique was mitigated through minimizing the rhizome size and exploring the seeds propagation potential. The land-use dilemma was alleviated by exploring the marginal land production potential. Additionally, constrains of lack of genotypes and agronomic practices for the miscanthus establishment on marginal land were improved by field trials on grassland (the most important marginal land type with a huge potential).These results can improve the implementation and expansion of miscanthus production. However, in addition to constrains improved in this thesis, the miscanthus production is currently constrained by many other technical, economic and financial, social and political, environmental issues. It is unlikely that the implementation and expansion will achieve without mitigating these constrains. Further research and support should address these barriers in an integrate manner.