Browsing by Subject "Minimum tillage"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Crop yield and fate of nitrogen fertilizer in maize-based soil conservation systems in Western Thailand
(2021) Wongleecharoen, Chalermchart; Cadisch, Georg
The increase in food demand and land scarcity in high-potential lowland areas have forced cropping intensification with a transformation of land use from subsistence to permanent agriculture in remote hillside in Southeast Asia. This change and inappropriate land use are the prime cause of soil degradation by erosion, which have negatively affected the agricultural systems productivity and sustainability in Thailand. Therefore, vulnerable land in sloping terrain is classified as unsuitable for continuous production of arable crops unless conservation measures are introduced to stabilize the landscape. Even though conservation practices can stabilize sloping land, farmers have not been widely adopted the measures due to various constraints, such as crop area loss and crop-tree competition. To improve land use management, a two-year study (2010-2011) was conducted at the Queen Sirikit research station (13°28’N, 99°16’E), Ratchaburi Province, Thailand, on a hillside with a slope of around 20%. The treatments consisted of (T1) maize (Zea mays L.) mono-crop under tillage and fertilization, (T2) maize intercropped with chili (Capsicum annuum L.) under tillage and fertilization, (T3) maize intercropped with chili, application of minimum tillage plus Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC) relay cropping and fertilizer application, (T4) maize intercropped with chili, application of minimum tillage with Jack bean relay cropping and fertilizer application plus perennial hedges of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit, (T5) as T3 but without fertilization, and (T6) as T4 but without fertilization. There was an additional plot of chili sole cropping to calculate the land equivalent ratio (LER). The first part of the study evaluated yield performance and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of crops using the 15N isotope technique under diverse fertilized cropping systems during the first year. Maize grain yields were lower in T2 (3.1 Mg ha-1), T3 (2.6 Mg ha-1) and T4 (3.3 Mg ha-1) than in the control (T1) (6.7 Mg ha-1). The total returns from maize and chili yields were 1,914, 5,129, 3,829, 3,900, 3,494, and 2,976 USD ha-1, for T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, respectively. Higher economic returns in mixed crop systems, by selling both maize and chilies, compensated for the maize area loss by intercropping. Maize 15NUE was highest in T2 (53.5%), being significantly higher than in T1 (47.0%), T3 (45.5%), and T4 (45.7%). Overall system’s NUE in T2 (56.8%) was comparable to T1 (53.8%) and T4 (54.5%) but significantly lower in T3 (48.6%). Minimum tillage and hedgerows (despite their positive filter effect) did not increase NUE but adversely affected maize growth during the establishment phase. The second part of the study examined nitrogen fertilizers fate and quantified partial nitrogen budgets at plot level over two cropping seasons for various maize-based cropping systems with or without fertilizer application. Overall plant uptake of fertilizer 15N applied to maize was 48.6-56.8% over the first season, while residual fertilizer 15N recovery of plants was only 2.3-4.9% over the subsequent season. The quantity of applied labelled N remaining in the soil at the end of season 1 and season 2 was 6.2-28.1% and 7.7-28.6%, respectively. Thus, 60.0-76.0% in season 1 and 12.7-31.3% in season 2 of the applied fertilizer 15N were accounted for within the plant-soil system. Consequently, 24.0-40.0% and 12.9-16.1% of labelled fertilizer N were not accounted for at the end of season 1 and season 2, respectively. The derived N balance over two years revealed severe soil N depletion under T1 (-202 kg N ha-1), T5 (-86 kg N ha-1) and T6 (-48 kg N ha-1), and a slightly negative N budget under T2 (-5 kg N ha-1). In contrast, T3 (87 kg N ha-1) and T4 (62 kg N ha-1) had positive N balances. The increase of N input via additional N fertilizer applied to chili and symbiotic N2 fixation of legumes, and the reduction of N losses by soil erosion and unaccounted fertilizer N (probably lost via leaching, volatilization and denitrification) were the main factors of the positive N balances under maize-chili intercropping systems with conservation measures and fertilization (T3 and T4). Maize yield decline under T1, T2, T5 and T6 in season 2 was related to negative N balances, while maize yield increase under T3 and T4 was related to positive N balances. However, maize-chili intercropping with fertilization had some advantage (LER > 1.0) relative to sole species cropping. Moreover, total returns from crop yields in season 2 of all maize-chili intercroppings (1,378-1,818 USD ha-1) were higher than chili sole cropping (1,321 USD ha-1), which pointed to its crucial role in decreasing production risk by reducing yield loss by pests and diseases observed in chili plants. The third part of the study used combined data of stable isotope discrimination and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to improve understanding of competition at the crop-soil-hedge interface. Hedges significantly reduced maize grain yield and aboveground biomass in rows close to hedgerows. ERT revealed water depletion was stronger in T1 than in T4 and T6, confirming time domain reflectometry (TDR) and leaf area data. In T4, water depletion was higher in maize rows close to the hedge than rows distant to hedges and maize grain δ13C was significantly less negative in rows close to the hedge ( 10.33‰) compared to distant ones ( 10.64‰). Lack of N increased grain δ13C in T6 ( 9.32‰, p ≤ 0.001). Both methods were negatively correlated with each other (r= 0.66, p ≤ 0.001). Combining ERT with grain δ13C and %N allowed identifying that maize growth close to hedges was limited by N and not by water supply. In conclusion, the results suggested a significant positive interaction between mineral N fertilizer, intercropping systems and soil conservation measures in maintaining or improving crop yields and N balances in Thailand’s hillside agriculture. Simultaneously, combining ERT imaging and 13C isotopic discrimination approaches improved the understanding of spatial-temporal competition patterns at the hedge-soil-crop interface and pointed out that competition in maize-based hedgerow systems was driven by nitrogen rather than water limitation. Therefore, sustainable agriculture might be achieved if farmers in Thailand combine soil conservation measures with appropriate and targeted N fertilizer use.
Soil erosion in Andean Cropping Systems: The impact of Rainfall Erosivity
(2002) Sonder, Kai; Leihner, Dietrich
Rationale and methods The Andean region of Colombia, 30% of the country, has about 15% of the tot. population and 50% of the rural population. A great part of the countries food-crops are grown on the hillsides of the region, which are severely degraded or threatened by degradation. The objectives of the present study were: a) to determine the applicability of the USLE rainfall erosivity factor to the Andean Region, particularly the energy-intensity term b) to calculate long-term erosivity data c) to establish the long-term erosivity of two soil types in the research area d) to evaluate the yield and soil conservation performance of several cassava-based cropping systems. Research was carried out at two sites in the Cauca department in the southwest of Colombia. Santander de Quilichao is located at 3o 6' N, 76 o 31' W, at an altitude of 990 m a.m.s.l., with an annual precipitation of 1,789 mm and an average temperature of 23.7 o C. Mondomo, which lies 2o 53' N, 76 o 35' W at an altitude of 1,450 m a.m.s.l., has an annual precipitation of 2,133 mm and an average temperature of 18.2 o C. The soils at both sites belong to the inceptisols, which form about 77% of the soils of the Cauca departments. In 1987 erosion plots were established at both sites on slopes of between 7% and 20% consisting of 8 treatments and 3 repetitions at Quilichao with 2 at Mondomo. During the research in this study, the 8 treatments comprised: 1) Continuous bare fallow, 2) Traditional cassava-based rotation, 3) Continuous sole cassava, 4) Cassava-based rotation with minimum tillage and mulch, 5) Cassava-based rotation with two previous years of bush fallow, 6) Cassava-based rotation with vetiver grass barriers, 7) Cassava-based rotation with legume strips, and 8) Cassava-based rotation with improved fallow element. Rainfall erosivity Drop size distribution measurements with a Joss-Waldvogel Distrometer showed that the USLE R factor is applicable for the research region as no significant differences were found between the measured kinetic energy of rainfall events and calculated values according to the USLE. The average annual r-factor values during the 12 year research period for Quilichao and Mondomo were 10,037 and 9,016 MJ ha-1 mm h-1 a-1 respectively. A highly significant relationship was found between a modified Fournier index based upon average monthly rainfall amounts and the equivalent monthly r-factor values. Soil losses K-factor values measured of 0.017 t h MJ-1 mm-1 at Quilichao and 0.011 t h MJ﷓1 mm-1 at Mondomo may be regarded as being between medium and low, although soil losses on the bare fallow plots were very high due to the extreme erosivity of the climate. Total soil losses in Quilichao on the bare fallow from 1986 to 1998 were 1,840 t ha-1. In Mondomo it was 2,380 t ha-1. From June 1994 to July 1997, the 7 cropped treatments in Quilichao showed susceptibility to erosion in the following order (from high to low): Sole continuous cassava, bush fallow >> farmer rotation, legume strips > improved fallow > minimum tillage, grass barriers. In Mondomo the susceptibility to erosion for the same period was: Sole continuous cassava >> legume strips >> bush fallow > improved fallow, farmer rotation > grass barriers, minimum tillage. When calculating soil loss for a representative plot only the minimum tillage and grass barrier treatments reached levels below the tolerable average annual soil losses under both the Quilichao and Mondomo conditions.The erosivity and erodibility values for the whole 12-year duration of this project showed that there is a highly significant relationship between annual soil loss amounts and the R-factor of the USLE. The continuous bare fallow plots showed strong declines of organic matter at both sites. Yield performance The two conservation treatments, minimum tillage and grass barriers, showed no significant differences regarding yield compared to the widely used continuous cassava system. The farmer rotation treatment showed the highest yield levels, but there were no significant differences between this treatment and the minimum tillage treatment at Mondomo and Quilichao. Conclusions The results confirm the high erosivity of the climate and support the necessity of maintaining permanent soil cover. The proven applicability of the R-Factor of the USLE for the region and the long-term soil erodibility values determined should enable the potential erosion risk to be estimated and appropriate soil conservation measures offered. Of the cropping systems evaluated, both the minimum tillage and the vetiver grass barrier treatments proved to be interesting alternatives to the local cropping systems as they reduced soil erosion to a sustainable level and at the same time reached or even surpassed the yields of the traditional cassava monocropping. All the other systems would lead to degradation if long-term permanent cropping was practised.