Browsing by Person "Juadjur, Andreas"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Effect of frozen to fresh meat ratio in minced pork on its quality
    (2023) Tomasevic, Igor; Witte, Franziska; Kühling, Rike Elisabeth; Berger, Lisa M.; Gibis, Monika; Weiss, Jochen; Röser, Anja; Upmann, Matthias; Joeres, Eike; Juadjur, Andreas; Bindrich, Ute; Heinz, Volker; Terjung, Nino
    The meat industry is typically using a mixture of fresh and frozen meat batters for minced meat production. Our goal was to find the exact threshold for fresh to frozen meat ratio capable of controlling the meat temperature during processing, but without having an adverse effect on the sensory quality of minced pork. To achieve this, the percentage of frozen meat used for the minced pork production was increased from 0% (control) to 50% (maximum) in 10% increments. To keep the minced meat temperature in control and make the processing resistant to fat smearing, the addition of 30% of frozen meat to the meat batter is sufficient. The soluble protein content, instrumental cutting force, and the sensory perceived firmness, juiciness, and inner cohesion were not affected by the addition of frozen meat. However, it has contributed to a significant increase of the drip loss and the amount of non-intact cells (ANIC). With the addition of frozen meat into the minced pork, the compliance to ANIC regulation by the German regulatory authorities is technologically (practically) almost impossible.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Influence of finely chopped meat addition on quality parameters of minced meat
    (2022) Witte, Franziska; Sawas, Erik; Berger, Lisa M.; Gibis, Monika; Weiss, Jochen; Röser, Anja; Upmann, Matthias; Joeres, Eike; Juadjur, Andreas; Bindrich, Ute; Heinz, Volker; Terjung, Nino
    Larger processing equipment to produce minced meat could affect its structure due to intensive processing and a high energy intake in the meat mass. To assess if this would result in alterations in the minced meat quality, finely chopped meat (FCM) was added in different concentrations (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 100%) to minced meat and quality parameters were analyzed. FCM was used to simulate different intensity of an unintended destruction of meat cells due to various processes. The amount of non-intact cells (ANIC) was determined histologically and furthermore, soluble protein content, water holding capacity, mechanical and sensory texture, and scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopy was applied to analyze the meat structure and quality. ANIC indicated that even adding 15% FCM was statistically (p < 0.05) distinguishable from 100% minced meat and 30% FCM had already 50 Vol.-% ANIC. In contrast, the addition of 15% or 30% FCM did not result in significant differences in drip loss of raw and cooked meat as well as mechanical and sensory texture analysis. This study showed that intensive processing might be detectable via ANIC, but that the minced meat quality was not affected.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Variations in the metabolome of unaged and aged beef from black-and-white cows and heifers by 1H NMR spectroscopy
    (2023) Bischof, Greta; Januschewski, Edwin; Witte, Franziska; Terjung, Nino; Heinz, Volker; Juadjur, Andreas; Gibis, Monika
    (1) Background: The selection of raw material and the postmortem processing of beef influence its quality, such as taste. In this study, the metabolome of beef from cows and heifers is examined for differences during aging. (2) Methods: Thirty strip loins from eight heifers and seven cows (breed code: 01–SBT) were cut into ten pieces and aged for 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. Samples from the left strip loins were wet-aged in vacuum, while samples from right strip loins were dry-aged at 2 °C and 75% relative humidity. The beef samples were extracted with methanol–chloroform–water, and the polar fraction was used for 1H NMR analysis. (3) Results: The PCA and OPLS-DA showed that the metabolome of cows and heifers varied. Eight metabolites revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the samples from cows and heifers. The aging time and aging type of beef also affected the metabolome. Twenty-eight and 12 metabolites differed significantly (p < 0.05) with aging time and aging type, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The variations between cows and heifers and aging time affect the metabolome of beef. By comparison, the influence of aging type is present but less pronounced.