Browsing by Person "Emire, Shimelis Admassu"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Application of two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy for the on-line monitoring of teff-based substrate fermentation inoculated with certain probiotic bacteria(2022) Alemneh, Sendeku Takele; Emire, Shimelis Admassu; Jekle, Mario; Paquet-Durand, Olivier; von Wrochem, Almut; Hitzmann, BerndThere is increasing demand for cereal-based probiotic fermented beverages as an alternative to dairy-based products due to their limitations. However, analyzing and monitoring the fermentation process is usually time consuming, costly, and labor intensive. This research therefore aims to apply two-dimensional (2D)-fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with partial least-squares regression (PLSR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for the on-line quantitative analysis of cell growth and concentrations of lactic acid and glucose during the fermentation of a teff-based substrate. This substrate was inoculated with mixed strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum A6 (LPA6) and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LCGG). The fermentation was performed under two different conditions: condition 1 (7 g/100 mL substrate inoculated with 6 log cfu/mL) and condition 2 (4 g/100 mL substrate inoculated with 6 log cfu/mL). For the prediction of LPA6 and LCGG cell growth, the relative root mean square error of prediction (pRMSEP) was measured between 2.5 and 4.5%. The highest pRMSEP (4.5%) was observed for the prediction of LPA6 cell growth under condition 2 using ANN, but the lowest pRMSEP (2.5%) was observed for the prediction of LCGG cell growth under condition 1 with ANN. A slightly more accurate prediction was found with ANN under condition 1. However, under condition 2, a superior prediction was observed with PLSR as compared to ANN. Moreover, for the prediction of lactic acid concentration, the observed values of pRMSEP were 7.6 and 7.7% using PLSR and ANN, respectively. The highest error rates of 13 and 14% were observed for the prediction of glucose concentration using PLSR and ANN, respectively. Most of the predicted values had a coefficient of determination (R2) of more than 0.85. In conclusion, a 2D-fluorescence spectroscopy combined with PLSR and ANN can be used to accurately monitor LPA6 and LCGG cell counts and lactic acid concentration in the fermentation process of a teff-based substrate. The prediction of glucose concentration, however, showed a rather high error rate.Publication Effect of refrigerated storage on some physicochemical characteristics of a teff‐based fermented beverage and the viability of the fermenting Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus used(2022) Alemneh, Sendeku Takele; Emire, Shimelis Admassu; Jekle, Mario; Hitzmann, BerndProbiotic beverages made from cereals become interesting in the recent food industries. In this contribution, a fermented teff-based probiotic beverage was produced using the whole grain teff flour and co-culture strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LPA6) and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LCGG). Then, the effect of 25 days of refrigerated storage on cell viability (LPA6 and LCGG), and contents of sugars, organic acids, and titratable acidity (TA), as well as pH values were examined. Furthermore, pathogenic microorganisms, hygiene indicators, and sensory tests of the beverage were analyzed. Presumptive cell counts of LPA6 and LCGG were observed to decrease throughout refrigerated storage. Glucose, lactic acid, maltose, and acetic acid contents were significantly (p < 0.05) increased over storage time. Also, pH reduction and TA increment were observed in storage time. Examined pathogenic microorganisms and hygiene indicators were not detected in the beverage. Sensory analysis of the beverage after 10 days of refrigerated storage was accepted by the panelists. Novelty Impact Statement Throughout refrigerated storage of teff-based probiotic beverage sugars and organic acids were produced. Sensory attributes of the newly produced teff-based probiotic beverage were accepted by the panelist after 10 days of refrigerated storage. The pH of the teff-based probiotic beverage became more acidic throughout 25 days of refrigerated storage.